CAR-T Therapy Followed by Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Can Improve Survival in Children Relapsed/Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome-positive B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a high complete remission (CR) rate, but relapse and prolonged measurable residual disease remain serious problems. We sought to describe the CR rate measurable residual disease negative rate and address the results and safety of pediatric patients who underwent after receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for CD19 (CAR-19) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of Ph-positive ALL. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted at Peking University People's Hospital from September 2013 to January 2021. 13 patients with relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL who received CAR-T therapy followed by allo-HSCT were included. We concentrated on the overall patient survival and CR rate. RESULTS: The median time between CAR-T therapy and allo-HSCT was 58 days. Among all the patients, the CR rate was 100%, the flow cytometry negativity rate was 84.62%, and the BCR-ABL negativity rate was 53.85% at 1 month after CAR-T infusion. All the patients achieved a major molecular response in 6 months after HSCT. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year OS rate was 66.7%, and the 3-year DFS rate was 61.5%. The 3-year OS rate of patients with BCR-ABL-positive pre-HSCT was significantly lower than that in the BCR-ABL-negative group (40.0% vs. 85.7%, P=0.042). Also, the same trend was observed for the 3-year DFS rate but did not differ significantly (40.0% vs. 75.0%, P=0.233). CONCLUSIONS: CAR-T therapy followed by allo-HSCT can be a safe and effective treatment for Ph-positive B-ALL pediatric patients.

Salvage haploidentical transplantation for graft failure after first haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation: an updated experience.

Graft failure is a fatal complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation where a second transplantation is usually required for salvage. However, there are no recommended regimens for second transplantations for graft failure, especially in the haploidentical transplant setting. We recently reported encouraging outcomes using a novel method (haploidentical transplantation from a different donor after conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide). Herein, we report updated outcomes in 30 patients using this method. The median time of the second transplantation was 96.5 (33-215) days after the first transplantation. Except for one patient who died at +19d and before engraftment, neutrophil engraftments were achieved in all patients at 11 (8-24) days, while platelet engraftments were achieved in 22 (75.8%) patients at 17.5 (9-140) days. The 1-year OS and DFS were 60% and 53.3%, and CIR and TRM was 6.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Compared with the historical group, neutrophil engraftment (100% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001) and platelet engraftment (75.8% versus 32.3%, p < 0.001) were better in the novel regimen group, and OS was also improved (60.0% versus 26.4%, p = 0.011). In conclusion, salvage haploidentical transplantation from a different donor using the novel regimen represents a promising option to rescue patients with graft failure after the first haploidentical transplantation.

The prognosis of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in infants and patients under 3 years old with acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients <3 years of age remains controversial. Data on haploidentical donor (HID) transplants in this age group is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 97 patients with acute leukemia aged <3 years who underwent HID transplantation at our institute. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and 3-year cumulative incidence rate of treatment-related mortality were 69.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.9%-78.7%), 74.2% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.2%), and 3.6% (95% CI: 0.9%-9.7%) in all 97 patients, respectively. The 3-year DFS and OS rate in patients diagnosed <1 year and patients diagnosed ≥1 year were comparable: 77.8% (95% CI: 62.2%-93.4%) versus 66.3% (95% CI: 55.0%-77.6%, p = .253) and 82.5% (95% CI: 66.3-98.7%) versus 72.8% (95% CI: 61.9%-83.7%, p = .153), respectively. At the last follow-up, 23 patients had died, and 20 had died of relapse. Multivariate analysis revealed that positive pre-HSCT flow cytometric minimal residual disease (hazard ratio 5.605, p = .000) and AML-M7 expression (hazard ratio 2.906, p = .014) were independent adverse prognostic variables for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: HID transplantation is potent and safe for infants and young patients with acute leukemia. Relapse is the primary cause of treatment failure.

Outcome and prognostic factors of haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric relapsed or refractory ETV6/RUNX1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: the role of haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ETV6/RUNX1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unclear. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors and explore the role of haplo-HSCT in the treatment of ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALL. METHODS: we analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 20 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALL and received chemotherapy/chimeric antigen receptor T-cell bridged to haplo-HSCT between 2016 and 2021 at our institution. RESULTS: with a median follow-up time of 47 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 35.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15.3-57.1%), 59.1% (95% CI: 37.2-81.0%), and 75.0% (95% CI: 56.0-94.0%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-HSCT measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity (hazard ratio, 13.275; 95% CI: 2.406-73.243; P = 0.003) had a significant negative impact on relapse. A total of 7 patients experienced positive ETV6/RUNX1 gene expression at a median of 7.2 months after haplo-HSCT, 5 of them experienced relapse at a median time of 12.1 months after haplo-HSCT. ROC curve analysis was performed to analyze the significance of pre-HSCT and post-HSCT ETV6/RUNX1 transcripts for predicting relapse; the AUC were 0.798 (95% CI: 0.567-1.0, P=0.035) and 0.875 (95% CI: 0.690-1.0, P=0.008), respectively. The optimal cut-off points to predict an inevitable relapse were 0.011% and 0.0019%, respectively. CONCLUSION: patients with R/R ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALL may benefit from haplo-HSCT. Deeply eliminating pre-HSCT MRD and preemptive treatment for post-HSCT MRD may be crucial to further improving the prognosis.

Long-term follow-up of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia: Report from a single centre.

Data from 200 children with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia who underwent their first haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) between 2015 and 2021 at our institution were analysed. The 4-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 71.9%, 62.3% and 32.4% respectively. The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) were 41.1% and 9.5% respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 56.1%, and that of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 27.3%. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (MRD+) status pre-HSCT was significantly associated with lower survival and a higher risk of relapse. The 4-year OS, EFS and CIR differed significantly between patients with MRD+ pre-HSCT (n = 97; 63.4%, 51.4% and 41.0% respectively) and those with MRD-negative (MRD-) pre-HSCT (n = 103; 80.5%, 73.3% and 23.8% respectively). Multivariate analysis also revealed that acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia without Down syndrome (non-DS-AMKL) was associated with extremely poor outcomes (hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS, EFS and CIR: 3.110 (1.430-6.763), 3.145 (1.628-6.074) and 3.250 (1.529-6.910) respectively; p-values were 0.004, 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). Thus, haplo-HSCT can be a therapy option for these patients, and MRD status pre-HSCT significantly affects the outcomes. As patients with non-DS-AMKL have extremely poor outcomes, even with haplo-HSCT, a combination of novel therapies is urgently needed.

Targeting TFH cells is a novel approach for donor-specific antibody desensitization of allograft candidates: an in vitro and in vivo study.

The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are associated with graft failure either following human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation or after organ transplantation. Although targeting B cells and plasma cells have been used for desensitization, there have been reports of failure. T-follicular helper (Tfh) cells assist B cells in differentiating into antibody-secreting plasma cells. We used haploidentical allograft as a platform to investigate the possibility of targeting Tfh cells to desensitize DSA. The quantities of circulating Tfh (cTfh) cell subsets in allograft candidates were abnormal, and these cells, including the cTfh2 and cTfhem cell subsets, were positively related to the production of anti-HLA antibodies. Ex vivo experiments showed that the cTfh cells of anti-HLA antibody-positive allograft candidates could induce B cells to differentiate into DSA-producing plasmablasts. The immune synapse could be involved in the assistance of cTfh cells to B cells in antibody production. In vitro experiments and in vivo clinical pilot studies indicated that targeting cTfh cells with sirolimus can inhibit their auxiliary function in assisting B cells. Ex vivo and in vivo studies demonstrated the effect of sirolimus and rituximab on DSA desensitization compared with either sirolimus or rituximab alone (60%, 43.75%, and 30%, respectively). Our findings provide new insight into the role of Tfh cells in the pathogenesis of DSA production in HLA-mismatched transplant candidates. Our data also indicate that targeting Tfh cells is a novel strategy for DSA desensitization and combination of sirolimus and rituximab might be a potential therapy. The prospective cohort of this study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn as #ChiCTR-OPC-15006672.

The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody levels on primary poor graft function and graft rejection in rituximab desensitized haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

This study investigates the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) levels on primary poor graft function (PGF) and graft rejection (GR) after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with rituximab desensitization. A total of 155 DSA-positive haplo-SCT candidates with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) between 2000 and 10,000 were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the optimal DSA MFI cutoff for identifying high-risk patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: DSA low-level group (2000 ≤ DSA MFI < 5000, Group A) and high-level group (5000 ≤ DSA MFI ≤ 10,000, Group B). The incidence of primary PGF was 6.5% (2.6%-10.3%), while GR incidence was 0.6% (0.0%-1.9%). Group A had significantly lower primary PGF rates than Group B (2.3% [0.0%-5.7%] vs. 12.9% [4.8%-21.0%], p = 0.017). Only one patient in Group B experienced GR. High DSA levels (5000 ≤ MFI ≤ 10,000) were identified as the sole independent risk factor for primary PGF and GR after haplo-SCT with rituximab desensitization (HR = 7.282, 95% CI 1.517-34.953, p = 0.013). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 14.7% (11.6%-17.8%), 16.3% (13.1%-19.4%), 69.0% (65.9%-76.2%), and 70.6% (66.4%-74.8%), respectively. DSA levels have an impact on efficiency of rituximab desensitization, and a DSA MFI threshold is provided for predicting primary PGF and GR.

Controllers or Bare Hands? A Controlled Evaluation of Input Techniques on Interaction Performance and Exertion in Virtual Reality.

Virtual Reality (VR) systems have traditionally required users to operate the user interface with controllers in mid-air. More recent VR systems, however, integrate cameras to track the headset's position inside the environment as well as the user's hands when possible. This allows users to directly interact with virtual content in mid-air just by reaching out, thus discarding the need for hand-held physical controllers. However, it is unclear which of these two modalities-controller-based or free-hand interaction-is more suitable for efficient input, accurate interaction, and long-term use under reliable tracking conditions. While interacting with hand-held controllers introduces weight, it also requires less finger movement to invoke actions (e.g., pressing a button) and allows users to hold on to a physical object during virtual interaction. In this paper, we investigate the effect of VR input modality (controller vs. free-hand interaction) on physical exertion, agency, task performance, and motor behavior across two mid-air interaction techniques (touch, raycast) and tasks (selection, trajectory-tracing). Participants reported less physical exertion, felt more in control, and were faster and more accurate when using VR controllers compared to free-hand interaction in the raycast setting. Regarding personal preference, participants chose VR controllers for raycast but free-hand interaction for mid-air touch. Our correlation analysis revealed that participants' physical exertion increased with selection speed, quantity of arm motion, variation in motion speed, and bad postures, following ergonomics metrics such as consumed endurance and rapid upper limb assessment. We also found a negative correlation between physical exertion and the participant's sense of agency, and between physical exertion and task accuracy.

Avapritinib is effective for treatment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with t (8;21) and kit mutation failing to immunotherapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

In patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), pre-emptive interferon-α therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion are noneffective in 30%-50% of patients. Avapritinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting KIT mutations. We retrospectively report about 20 patients with t(8;21) AML and KIT mutations treated with avapritinib after allo-HSCT with MRD and most failing to respond to immunotherapy. Reduction of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 after 1 month of treatment was ≥1 log in 12 patients (60%), which became negative in 4 patients (20%). In 13 patients who received avapritinib for ≥3 months, the reduction was ≥1 log in all patients, which became negative in 7 patients (53.8%). The median follow-up time was 5.5 (2.0-10.0) months from avapritinib initiation to the last follow-up. Three patients underwent hematologic relapse and survived. Among all 20 patients, RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcripts turned negative in 9 patients (45%). The efficacy did not differ significantly between D816 and non-D816 KIT mutation groups. The main adverse effect was hematological toxicity, which could generally be tolerated. In summary, avapritinib was effective for MRD treatment in patients with t(8;21) AML with KIT mutations failing to respond to immunotherapy after allo-HSCT.

Simple and Versatile Nitrooxylation: Noncyclic Hypervalent Iodine Nitrooxylating Reagent.

Organic nitrates are broadly applied as pharmaceuticals (acting as efficient nitric oxide donor), energetic materials, building blocks in organic synthesis, etc. However, practical and direct methods to access organic nitrates efficiently are still rare, mainly due to the lack of powerful nitrooxylating reagents. Herein, we report bench-stable and highly reactive noncyclic hypervalent iodine nitrooxylating reagents, oxybis(aryl-λ3 -iodanediyl) dinitrates (OAIDNs, 2), which are prepared just by using aryliodine diacetate and HNO3 . The reagents are used to achieve a mild and operationally simple protocol to access diverse organic nitrates. By employing of 2, zinc-catalyzed regioselective nitrooxylation of cyclopropyl silyl ethers is realized efficiently to access the corresponding ß-nitrooxy ketones with high functional-group tolerance. Moreover, a series of direct and catalyst-free nitrooxylations of enolizable C-H bonds are carried out smoothly to afford the desired organic nitrates within minutes by just mixing the substrates with 2 in dichloromethane.

Optimized therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: long-term clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life assessment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have poor survival, necessitating the exploration of optimized therapeutic strategy. Here, we aimed to investigate clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) after total therapy, which included allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in the early phase after transplantation, followed by multiple measurable residual disease (MRD) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-guided DLIs. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had refractory or relapsed AML and had received non-T-cell-depleted allo-HSCT at Peking University Institute of Hematology were included in the study. If the patients achieved complete remission at 30 days after transplantation and had no evidence of relapse, severe infection, organ failure, and active GvHD at the time of planned DLI, prophylactic DLI was administered at 30 days after transplantation for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related HSCT or at 45-60 days after transplantation for haploidentical or unrelated HSCT. Subsequently, multiple DLIs were administered based on MRD results and whether they developed GvHD after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were eligible. Eighty-seven patients received prophylactic DLI (group B), while 18 did not receive prophylactic DLI (group A). Among 105 patients, the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD and chronic GvHD was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.6%-50.6%) and 73.3% (95% CI = 67.4%-79.2%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years after transplantation were 31.5% (95% CI = 21.9%-41.1%), 22.1% (95% CI = 11.3%-32.9%), and 46.4% (95% CI = 36.8%-56.0%), respectively. In group B, the CIR, TRM, and LFS at 5 years after transplantation were 27.6% (95% CI = 17.6%-37.6%), 21.6% (95% CI = 11.2%-32.0%), and 50.8% (95% CI = 40.0%-61.6%), respectively. At the end of follow-up, 48 patients survived, and more than 90% of survivors had satisfactory recoveries of HR-QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that total therapy is not only associated with decreased CIR, comparable TRM, and better long-term LFS, but also with satisfactory HR-QoL for refractory or relapsed AML, compared with those of standard of care therapy reported previously. Therefore, total therapy may be an optimized therapeutic strategy for refractory or relapsed AML.

Safety and outcomes of maintenance therapy with third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with T315I mutation.

Studies using third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as maintenance therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) harboring the T315I mutation remain scarce. We conducted a cohort study to evaluate the safety and outcomes of ponatinib maintenance therapy after HCT in Ph+ALL patients with T315I mutation. BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations were assessed using direct sequencing. Twenty-six Ph+ALL patients with T315I mutation who received allogeneic HCT were enrolled. After HCT, ponatinib was administered as a prophylactic regimen (n = 12) or a preemptive therapy (n = 7). Seven patients did not receive maintenance therapy. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 69.4 % of patients with ponatinib maintenance, but most presented with mild toxicities. Serious non-hematological AEs were not observed. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse in patients receiving prophylactic ponatinib were 81.5 %, 91.7 %, and 18.5 %, respectively, whereas they were 39.8 %, 46.0 %, and 48.4 % in the total cohort, respectively. The measurable BCR-ABL transcripts in the first three months after HCT was associated with poor DFS and OS, even with ponatinib therapy. We concluded that maintenance therapy with ponatinib is safe after HCT. Patients with T315I mutation who received prophylactic regimen showed promising results with an acceptable relapse rate and encouraging survival. However, patients with measurable BCR-ABL transcripts early post-transplant had poor outcomes.

Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for paediatric patients with MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: The presence of mixed-lineage leukaemia rearrangement (MLL-r) in paediatric patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a poor prognostic predictor. Whether allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is beneficial in such cases remains unclear. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes and prognostic factors of allo-HSCT in 44 paediatric patients with MLL-r AML in the first complete remission (CR1) between 2014 and 2019 at our institution. RESULTS: For all the 44 patients, the 3-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 74.5%, 64.1%, and 29.1%, respectively. Among them, 37 (84.1%) patients received haploidentical (haplo)-HSCT, and the 3-year OS, EFS, and CIR were 73.0%, 65.6%, and 26.4%, respectively. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) post-transplantation was 27.3%, and that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 15.9%. The overall 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) post-transplantation was 40.8%, and that of extensive cGVHD was 16.7%. Minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (MRD +) status pre-HSCT was significantly associated with lower survival and higher risk of relapse. The 3-year OS, EFS, and CIR differed significantly between patients with MRD + pre-HSCT (n = 15; 48.5%, 34.3% and 59%) and those with MRD-pre-HSCT (n = 29; 89.7%, 81.4% and 11.7%). Pre-HSCT MRD + status was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Allo-HSCT (especially haplo-HSCT) can be a viable strategy in these patients, and pre-HSCT MRD status significantly affected the outcomes.

Prevalence and risk factors of antibodies to HLA according to different cut-off values of mean fluorescence intensity in haploidentical allograft candidates: A prospective study of 3805 subjects.

The importance of anti-HLA antibodies in transplantation settings, such as HLA-mismatched or haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and platelet refractoriness, is widely recognized. In previous reports, it was mentioned that several cut-off values of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were related to graft rejection in the environment of HLA mismatched stem cell transplantation and the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of anti-HLA antibodies according to those cut-off values of MFI. A total of 3805 patients with hematologic disease were prospectively enrolled and analyzed. When using MFI of anti-HLA antibodies ≥500, ≥1000, ≥1500, ≥2000, ≥5000, and ≥ 10,000 as cut-off values for positivity, the prevalence of class I or II anti-HLA antibodies ranged from 4.6% to 20.2% in all cases. When the MFI cut-off value was ≥500 for positivity, multivariate analysis indicated that platelet transfusion, underlying disease, and pregnancy were the most important risk factors for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies for the total patients. Subgroup analysis according to age, gender, and underlying disease showed that pregnancy was the most important risk factor for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. For all patients (n = 3805), when anti-HLA antibody positivity was defined according to different MFI cut-off values, including ≥1000, ≥1500, ≥2000, ≥5000, and ≥ 10,000, an association of platelet transfusion and pregnancy with anti-HLA antibodies was also demonstrated. Our results suggest that pregnancy and platelet transfusion are the main risk factors for the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in haploid allograft candidates, providing evidence for guiding the evaluation of anti-HLA antibodies and helping donor selection for HLA-mismatched transplant candidates.

Development and validation of a mortality predicting scoring system for severe aplastic anaemia patients receiving haploidentical allogeneic transplantation.

Haploidentical allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is a significant alternative treatment for severe aplastic anaemia (SAA). To improve this process by modifying the risk stratification system, we conducted a retrospective study using our database. 432 SAA patients who received haplo-HSCT between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled. These patients were divided into a training (n = 288) and a validation (n = 144) subset randomly. In the training cohort, longer time from diagnosis to transplantation, poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status and higher haematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score were independent risk factors for worse treatment-related mortality (TRM) in the final multivariable model. The haplo-HSCT scoring system was developed by these three parameters. Three-year TRM after haplo-HSCT were 6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1-21%], 21% (95% CI, 7-40%), and 47% (95% CI, 20-70%) for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group, respectively (P < 0·0001). In the validation cohort, the haplo-HSCT scoring system also separated patients into three risk groups with increasing risk of TRM: intermediate-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2·45, 95% CI, 0·92-6·53] and high-risk (HR 11·74, 95% CI, 3·07-44·89) compared with the low-risk group (P = 0·001). In conclusion, the haplo-HSCT scoring system could effectively predict TRM after transplantation.